Profile

resqgeek: (Default)
ResQgeek

May 2024

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

 What, exactly, is the history relating to the singing/playing of the national anthem before sporting events? I know it is a very long standing tradition, but I wonder exactly why it was started in the first place. I suppose I could try to do some research into that history, but I'm feeling a bit lazy, and really, it doesn't matter. Whatever the reason it was started, I think the more relevant question is whether it makes sense to continue it. To me, it feels like a symptom of that nationalistic, secular religion that carries the name of patriotism, but isn't a true patriotism. It is a glorification of the national symbols at the expense of the real work of working to ensure that our country always strives towards the best possible realization of its founding principles. It makes it too easy for people to salute the flag and feel like they are good citizens and then turn away and ignore our failings.

To listen to the loudest voices of outrage, you would think that taking a knee during the national anthem is the highest form of disrespect for our nation. But, historically, kneeling has long been a gesture of respect. I wonder how many of these vocal protesters are Catholics who regularly bend a knee every time they go to church? How can they perform that gesture of respect so mindlessly, and then find the very conscious act of taking a knee for the anthem as disrespectful? Perhaps it's because they haven't paused to think about what is happening. Instead, they are simply reacting to an action that breaks the norms, that intentionally calls attention to itself. They simply cannot abide the "other", those who refuse to conform. "Don't rock the boat" seems to be their motto. More evidence that their patriotism is just for show, because if they were truly patriotic, then they would want to understand the protest, to right the injustice, to make our country better for everyone.

In contrast to those protesters who take a knee for the anthem, let's talk about the actions of the fans that truly disrespect the anthem. Before a Baltimore Orioles game at Camden Yards, the fans routinely shout "OH!" when the singer reaches the light "Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave?", which clearly shows their pride in their local team, but certainly is not respectful of the anthem. Similarly, at every home game of the Washington Capitals, some 18,000 fans shout "RED!" when the singer reaches the light about the "rockets red glare" to show their "Rock the Red" pride in the home hockey team. I find both of these shout-outs for the home teams to be *FAR* more disrespectful than a silent protest that simply involves a player taking a knee during the anthem.

Ultimately, I think that those angered by these protests are less concerned with the level of respect being shown for the anthem than they are with the reason for the protest. They are offended because these protests highlight serious injustices in our country, which upsets their comfortable view that the country is fine the way it is. If they acknowledge the legitimacy of the protests, then they would be forced to acknowledge that their comfort is built upon a system that is biased in their favor, and that true justice requires them to confront the realities of racism and bias in our social structures. And since they are not willing and/or able to do so, they must find ways to discredit the protesters. 

It is sad, really, that all of this energy is being expended arguing about the patriotism of the protesters, instead of addressing the very real injustices that they are trying to draw attention to. Addressing the issues of injustice would be true patriotism.

I've been thinking about writing about Colin Kaepernick and the issues raised by his refusal to stand for the national anthem as a gesture of support for the Black Lives Matter movement. The public reaction to his actions appear to have ended his career, since he has not been offered a new contract by any NFL team for this season. Around the league, a number of other players have begun to take a knee for the national anthem in support of Kaepernick and Black Lives Matter. It has been a couple of decades since I followed the NFL, but the cultural and economic impact of the league make it impossible to remain completely unaware of the controversy.

After the President dove into this issue this weekend, with a series of tweets (including coarse, vulgar language) calling for the owners of the NFL teams to fire any players who refuse to stand for the national anthem, I feel compelled to comment. It may take me a couple of posts to say everything I need to say, and even then I'm afraid that I won't be able to articulate all of what I'm thinking in ways that make sense.

Since the act of taking a knee or refusing to stand for the national anthem is, in my opinion, a form of protected free speech, I think it would be helpful to talk about the First Amendment. I suspect that there aren't many people who wouldn't recognize that the First Amendment protects our right to free speech (among other things), but I'm not sure how many understand that the First Amendment only prevents the government from restricting our practice of free speech. The First Amendment does not prevent employers from restricting the speech of their employees. In other words, you do NOT have an unrestricted right to free speech in the workplace.

So, if the NFL teams want to discipline players for protesting during the National Anthem, they have every right to do so. This is why Kaepernick cannot find a job in the league, and why he hasn't filed a lawsuit claiming that his free speech rights are being infringed. I have an opinion about whether Kaepernick deserves to be sanctioned for his protest, but the league and its teams can choose to do so if they wish.

But, when the President of the United States, who took an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, demands that players who express themselves in ways that he dislikes be fired, the equation changes. Now the players' speech rights are being infringed by government fiat, which is a clear violation of the First Amendment. It defies belief that our President either does not seem to understand or does not care that his demands are in direct conflict with the oath of office he took at his inauguration. Regardless of the merits of the protest (which I will address in a separate post, I think), the President simply has NO business injecting himself into the matter.

Beyond that, I find it troubling that so many people are so strongly offended when people don't stand for the national anthem. Many will argue that this is simply patriotism, but I would think that a true patriot would respect the rights of others to express themselves this way. It feels to me as if we've elevated respect for the flag and anthem to the position of a nationalist religion. Any action perceived to disrespect the flag or anthem thus becomes heresy, subject to the harshest sanction. This hardly seems to be a reflection of a healthy society to me. Wouldn't it better for us to embrace a patriotism that cares less for symbolic actions and focuses instead on acknowledging our shortcomings and working together to overcome them?
Last Thursday marked the second anniversary of the tragic accident that took our younger daughter from us after just 9½ years. While I had planned some low key tributes for the day (including some BookCrossing releases), we really didn’t plan to have any major commemoration of the day, since we prefer to remember her life, rather than focusing on her death.

About a week and a half ago, the head coach for the field hockey teams at our daughter’s high school approached us with a couple of questions. She was aware that the anniversary was coming up, and noted that the teams were scheduled for scrimmages that day. She wanted to know if we had plans, indicating that there would be no problem with our daughter missing her scrimmage that day if she needed to. After hearing that we didn’t have any major plans, she asked if there was something that the teams could do to mark the anniversary.

After some thought and discussion, we agreed that both the varsity and the junior varsity teams would wear pink t-shirts bearing Becky’s name for the scrimmages (they couldn’t wear official uniforms in any event, since they weren’t official games). We helped prepare the shirts for all the girls on both teams, as well as for the coaching staff. When the teams arrived at the field for the games, the coaches explained the significance of the shirts to the coaches for the other school (an all-girls Catholic prep school), who indicated that they would include Becky in their pre-game prayer.

After the games, the teams posed for a group photo on the prep school campus, with the Washington Monument in the background:

I think it speaks highly of the coaching staff that they took the time and initiative to do commemorate this anniversary of a child they never knew, the younger sister of a player who has only been a part of the team for about a month. To me, it shows that they are concerned with much more than just playing field hockey and winning games…they really care about their players and what goes on in their lives beyond their sport. It means a lot to us that they chose to remember our younger daughter with us, but it means even more that they care enough about our older daughter for them to take the lead in this memorial.

All-Stars

Jun. 21st, 2011 10:41 am
resqgeek: (Default)
For the first time since my daughter started playing soccer, back in 2006, my daughter was selected to represent her recreation league at the regional all-star tournament.  We have known other girls who were selected for the all-star team in earlier seasons, but the timing of our daughter's selection was ideal, as this will be her last season playing youth soccer (she is planning to switch to field hockey in the fall).  The tournament was organized in a non-elimination, points format, where each team played each of the other teams in their group, and the team with the best record winning the championship.  My daughter's team was in a group with four other teams from around the region and would play four games in two days.

I wasn't prepared for the results.  My daughter's team and one of the others were badly out-matched, each scoring NO goals as they struggled to an 0-3-1 record.  My daughter's team was placed last on the goal differential tie-breaker, as they had allowed more goals than the other team.  The team that won the group posted a perfect 4-0-0 record.

Along the way, I learned that the winning team selected their all-stars back in September, at the beginning of the fall season, and that they had been having weekly practices since then.  Contrast that with our league's selection at the end of the spring season, with only two weeks to prepare for the tournament, and the results become anything but surprising.

Under the tournament rules, players are eligible if they play for a recreational league team during the season and do NOT play for a travel/select team during that same time period.  There does not appear to be any rules governing the selection of the all-stars or the timing of that selection, so that these details are up to the individual leagues.  This means that the undefeated team does not appear to have violated any rules.

The problem is, that it strikes me as a violation of the spirit of the tournament.  I would think that an all-star tournament for recreational leagues should be a way to reward those recreational players who showed outstanding performance during the season.  The very nature of a recreational league is that participation should be about having fun and learning the game, rather than a focus on winning.  Selection of the all-stars at the beginning of the season is unfair to players who might otherwise show surprising development during the season, and shift the focus away from the ideals of fun and learning and places it firmly on winning the tournament.  In the end, it makes the tournament less fun (except maybe for the winners), and makes the all-star status less meaningful for those that were selected for their performance through the season.  What started out as recognition for a job well-done becomes a frustrating struggle to preserve some dignity on the field.  It was painful to watch.

The behavior of the coaches and parents for the better teams in the group was awful as well.  In one of our games, we trailed 5-0, and the coaches for the other team were still screaming at their girls, demanding that they continue to press their attack, even after it became all too clear that we were never going to be able to make an effective effort to come back.  The parents were even worse, yelling at their daughters when they made mistakes and encouraging them to be aggressive in their play against our weaker team.  What lessons are these girls learning from their coaches and parents?

I suppose I should be glad that our daughter's recreational league fosters an environment that does not promote such attitudes.  We rarely have issues with coaches or parents who promote winning at all costs or are mean-spirited towards other teams.  While we celebrate victories, the emphasis was always on effort and fun, rather than the final results, and the girls generally enjoyed themselves, even when they didn't win.  All of which left me feeling disgusted and frustrated by the attitudes of many of the other teams I saw play at the tournament.
On Sunday, my wife and I went to watch the final game of the season for the travel soccer team our younger daughter was supposed to play on this fall. While it was nice to see the girls and their parents, we were disappointed to hear that the team had had a disappointing season. Not only had they lost most of their games, there was a great deal of tension between the parents and the coaches, and it looks like the team may fall apart before next season. Watching the game, I noticed that the girls seemed to lack any assertiveness on the field, waiting for the other team to make a play and then reacting to it, rather than challenging for the ball and forcing their opponents to make a play. There also didn't seem to be any players who were clear leaders on the field.

I couldn't help wondering how things might have been different. Our daughter's experiences last spring, playing with her older sister's team, taught her how to assert herself against bigger, stronger players. Her self-confidence grew tremendously after learning that she could play well against the older girls, and that translated into both highly assertive play at her own age level as well as well as a growing ability to assume leadership on the field. We'll never know for sure, but I'd like to think that this team would have had more success if she'd been able to join them for the season.

I also think that the tensions with the coaches might have been moderated as well. My wife was planning to be the team manager, a role in which she could have served as a buffer between the coaches and the other parents. She is generally pretty good and helping people work together, and perhaps she could have prevented some of the hard feelings that have emerged. Or not. It's hard to say. But in any event, it was a little sad to see that the team we'd helped get established struggle. We originally only wanted to find a place for our daughter to develop her skills and find a challenge worthy of her talent. We're really sad to find that our efforts have been such a general failure.
Tags:

Having a ball

Jun. 10th, 2010 01:52 pm
resqgeek: (Default)
Lest anyone think that this spring has been all about our older daughter, my younger daughter has had an outstanding spring as well.

The year began with her joining her soccer coaches and teammates for some winter league indoor soccer. The dynamics of the game are different, with boards to bounce the ball from and no out-of-bounds. Unfortunately, there was significant shortage of teams their age, so most of their games were against older teams made up of players from travel teams. It was a disappointing season as they were defeated regularly (and by wide margins).

However, with the arrival of spring, her team returned to outdoor play. After a couple weeks of practice, the season began, and our daughter found herself playing sparingly and mostly on defense. While she can play well in the backfield, this position doesn't really utilize all of her speed and skill. The team struggled in those first couple of games, and we tried to encourage the coach to shift our daughter to mid-field or forward.

Things began to change at the third week of the season. The coaches for our older daughter's team faced a problem. A number of the girls had to leave at halftime for other activities, leaving him with only 10 players (they play 11-on-11). Our younger daughter often practices and scrimmages with this team, so the coaches were familiar with her, and asked her to step in and play. She didn't even hesitate.

This was a big change for her in many ways. Her own team plays 8-on-8 on a half-size field in a game divided into four 15 minute quarters. Now she was playing with girls 2-3 years older than she was, on a full-size field, in a game divided into two 30 minute halves. What happened was impressive. She outplayed almost everyone on the field, forcing her sister's teammates to step up and improve their play. Our younger daughter showed incredible determination as she stripped the ball from bigger players and ran through the defenders that tried to stop her.

The next week, her older sister and a number of other players were attending the All-County Chorus performances, again leaving their coach with only 10 players. Our younger daughter borrowed her sisters uniform and played the entire game for her sister's team, helping them in a 3-0 victory.

We started talking to her coaches about her performance with her older sister's team, and the coaches started to take note of her skills as they took a sudden leap to the next level. By week five of the season, she'd been moved to a forward position on her own team and had scored her first goal of the season. That same week, her sister's coach again only had 11 players, so he used our younger daughter as a substitute, giving some of the older girls breaks.

In the second to last week of the season, she again played a significant portion (nearly 2/3) of her sister's team's game, before rushing off to her own game, where she scored two of the three goals in a 3-0 victory. When the season ended, she had scored four goals, played in all 8 of her own games and 4 of the 8 games for her older sister's team.

Her own team improved along with our daughter, so that by their final games, they were playing strong positionally and making beautiful passes. Their final game was against another strong team, and they put in a solid defensive performance to backstop our daughter's goal to earn a 1-0 victory. The coaches were thrilled with the way the team had improved and in particular singled out our daughter as one of the best players on the team.

At the last game she played for her sister's team, there was a coach from a U13 travel team scouting for potential players. While our younger daughter was clearly too young for his team, he was quite impressed with her performance against the older player, and strongly encouraged us to have her try out for the U10 travel team. She has been to three try-out sessions in the last two weeks, working to prove her skills. If she makes the team, it is likely to radically change our weekends for next fall, but it appears to be the best way for our daughter to continue to improve her skills.
Tags:
In an astonishingly credulous piece on the front page of the sports section of today's Washington post is a chart that correlates the pre-election day Washington Redskins game results to the outcome of the presidential election. The caption reads: In 16 of the 17 presidential elections since the Redskins moved to Washington in 1937, the incumbent party has kept the White House when the Redskins won their final home game before the election. The lone exception: President Bush's victory over Sen. John Kerry in 2004.

But I have to ask, what's the point? Is there any reason to expect any sort of causal relationship here? I certainly can't think of any plausible reason why these two sets of results have any meaningful causal relationship. While they have correlated amazingly well, it strikes me as a case of finding patterns because we want them to be there. Note for example, that the football results are the last home game results rather than the last game prior to the election. How does the pattern change if we use the road games instead of the home games? But nothing in the chart in the paper even hints at these questions, but leaves it up to the reader to figure out on their own.

For the record, this year's last home game before the election was last night's loss to the Steelers.

Proud dad

Jun. 10th, 2007 05:12 pm
resqgeek: (Default)
Not only did the older Qgeeklet have her first piano recital this weekend, but she also competed in her first soccer tournament. They easily won their first game, yesterday morning, in a 5-1 romp. We rushed from the piano recital to the semi-final game in the afternoon. They won this game, 2-0, but it was a hard fought win, with the other team giving a strong effort. This afternoon they played in the championship game against a team that they have never beaten. The girls went out and played their hearts out, but it was still a 0-0 draw halfway through the fourth quarter, when one of our midfielders booted a penalty kick over everyone's heads into the goal. When the whistle blew for the end of the game it took the girls a couple of seconds to realize they had won, but then they all started jumping and screaming! It was amazingly good fun, and the girls are all thrilled.
Tags:
Maybe we are good luck for the Nationals, or maybe it was just time for the losing streak to end. The Nationals scored a run in the first inning, and the Marlins didn't get their first hit until the seventh inning. Along the way there was plenty to cheer about as the Nationals racked up a 6-0 victory, including a spectacular diving catch in the 8th inning to keep the Marlins off the scoreboard. The girls seemed to enjoy themselves, though the younger daughter got bored by the end. As usual, my daughters charmed everyone around us, including the two young ladies in the row in front of us. It was a great evening.

In other news, my older daughter's soccer team rocks! They dominated their game today against a previously undefeated team, winning a 4-0 victory. Afterward, the girls and their coaches challenged the parents to a scrimmage. Aside from proving just how out of shape I am, it was a complete blast. Those girls play tough, especially when they get a chance to take a little out a little on their parents. It turned out to be a pretty even match, tied 2-2 well into the second half. Eventually, the parents just ran out of steam, and the girls got a third goal to win. It was a lot of fun, even if I could barely breath by the end.
Tags:
Today's sports news leaves me feeling a bit confused. The Los Angeles Galaxy has apparently signed David Beckham to a five year contract reported to be worth $250 million. This is from a team in a league where the average player salary is about $100,000 per year. Now I understand that Beckham is famous and will undoubtedly draw crowds to the Galaxy games to see him play, but soccer has never caught on as a spectator sport here in the US, and I don't see how spending this kind of money for one of the world's most famous players is going to change that in the long term. Furthermore, why would Beckham want to play here, after playing in the much more competitive environment in Europe?

[via The Washington Post]
Tags:
Cal Ripken's election to the Baseball Hall of Fame is anything but surprising. After all, he did break Lou Gehrig's record for consecutive games played. But only two other members of the Hall of Fame have ever received a higher percentage of votes in their elections: Tom Seaver (in 1992) and Nolan Ryan (in 1999). Cal received 98.5% of the available votes, a nearly unanimous election. And it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Cal Ripken might not have been the most talented baseball player of his time and he certainly wasn't the most powerful. What he was was reliable. He played in 2,632 consecutive games in a career that spanned 21 seasons and a total of 3,0001 games. He had an incredible work ethic, and understood that the fans were important to the game. He stayed at the ballpark long after the game to sign autographs for anyone who wanted one. He was humble and quiet, traits that are far to rare among professional athletes. Today, he spends his retirement working with youth baseball and the minor league teams he owns, helping to promote the game he loves.

See Thomas Boswell's column from today's Washington Post.
Tags:
When lunch time rolled around today, I took a look at the food I brought to the office and realized that it was woefully inadequate to the task of satisfying my hunger today. So I went out to a little restaurant that I like. I ended up seated near the entrance and I was amused and a little surprised to observe that there was a sizable number of people asking to sit in the upstairs dining room, where the big screen TV was carrying the first World Cup game for the US team. We may not be falling over ourselves in grand displays of enthusiasm, but there are people (who aren't recent immigrants) who are following and watching the US team. Unfortunately, it looks like they might be disappointed...The Czech Republic is currently leading 2-0...

In other world cup news, I'm happy to see that Australia won its first match! I think I'm going to be contrarian and cheer for the US and Australia...
Tags:
A couple of weeks ago, the World Baseball Classic got underway, and I posted an entry here expressing some surprise at some of the countries that were fielding teams for the tournament. I've been trying to say abreast of the tournament as it has progressed, but it hasn't been easy. The papers have been full of news about Major League Baseball's spring training, but precious little about the WBC.

Personally, I like the idea of a regular international tournament for Baseball. Somehow it seems wrong to me that the Major League championship is called the "World Series" but only teams from the US are eligible (except for Toronto), especially given how popular baseball is outside the US in Latin America and Asia. So, I think the WBC is a great idea. But if the press coverage of the tournament is any indication, I'm definitely in the minority.

Anyway, the first round play didn't produce any surprising results. South Korea and Japan advanced from Group A; US and Mexico from Group B; Cuba and Puerto Rico from Group C; and Venezuela and the Dominican Republic from Group D. Perhaps the biggest surprise of the tournament occurred during second round play, when Mexico, which had no chance of advancing, defeated the US and eliminated them from the tournament. The Semi-finalist included Cuba, the Dominican Republic, South Korea and Japan. The title game will be tonight at 9pm (east coast US time) between Japan and Cuba.
Tags:
Today's paper has an article about the "World Baseball Classic," an international tournament sponsored by Major League Baseball, which begins today with games in Tokyo. I guess this is supposed to be something like a World Cup for baseball, which makes sense to me because baseball has become an international phenomenon, with Major League players from many different countries playing here in the US. I'm not even confident that the US will win the thing...the teams from the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico and Venezuela all look strong, too. So, this actually has some potential to be entertaining.

But here's the thing. I was looking at the list of teams, and a few of the countries struck me as surprising. Below is the entire field...do any of these countries seem out of place to you?

Pool A: South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, China
Pool B: U.S., Mexico, Canada, South Africa
Pool C: Cuba, Netherlands, Panama, Puerto Rico
Pool D: Australia, Dominican Republic, Italy, Venezuela

I think I'm going to cheer for the Aussies!
Tags:
Yesterday, I focused on the Nuptial Mass and how much I enjoyed it. Today, I'd like to discuss the reception, and the amusing behavior of the wedding guests. The reception was held at a lovely converted old farmhouse on a historic mill site, about thirty miles west of Richmond. It was a beautiful setting, and I deeply regret that I didn't bring my camera to take some pictures in the late afternoon light, while we waited for the bridal party to arrive from the church.

Now, to explain what happened at the reception, you need to remember that the Washington Redskins were playing Tampa in their first playoff game in half a decade. Kickoff was at 4:30 Saturday afternoon, about the time everyone started arriving for the reception. The ongoing game was to exert a significant influence on the reception, as most of the bride's family was from the Washington suburbs and were devoted Redskins fans!

Shortly after we arrived, we noticed that one of the bride's uncles had brought a pocket sized portable television, and was desperately trying to find a spot that afforded him the best reception of the game. Eventually, he found a seat at one of the tables, set up his TV and sat down to watch the game. When my BIL arrived, I turned to my wife and said "Wait until he sees the TV." My wife seemed to think that he would be on his best behavior, but as soon as he saw the TV, he immediately changed course through the room and made a beeline to see the game. Soon, there was a small crowd gathered around this tiny television, trying to see the game.

This proved to be an untenable situation. The screen was simply too small for that many people to view it at the same time. Someone reported that there was a children's playroom upstairs, with a television, and so several moved upstairs to check out this information. A few minutes later, they returned, looking rather depressed. It seems that the mother of the groom insisted that that TV was reserved for children's programming, to keep the youngest guests happy. There were a number of grumbled complaints about the timing of the wedding and such, but most people seemed resigned to missing the game.

Not everyone, though. A resourseful soul discovered that the cottage next door (reserved by the happy couple for their wedding night) had cable television and was available for people who wanted to watch the game. The true diehards headed next door to watch the game, and throughout dinner, periodic game updates circulated through the reception as people popped out to check the progress of the games. Of course, it ended up being a bit of a nail biter of a game, and as the game neared its conclusion, the reception hall became quiet empty. At first, I thought people were leaving early, but as we got ready to leave (to visit my MIL in the hospital and get the girls home to bed), I learned the error of my reasoning. As we loaded into the van, a rather large crowd of very jubilant guests burst from the cottage. The game was over, the Redskins victorious, and the party could now continue!
Tags: