Profile

resqgeek: (Default)
ResQgeek

May 2024

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

 What, exactly, is the history relating to the singing/playing of the national anthem before sporting events? I know it is a very long standing tradition, but I wonder exactly why it was started in the first place. I suppose I could try to do some research into that history, but I'm feeling a bit lazy, and really, it doesn't matter. Whatever the reason it was started, I think the more relevant question is whether it makes sense to continue it. To me, it feels like a symptom of that nationalistic, secular religion that carries the name of patriotism, but isn't a true patriotism. It is a glorification of the national symbols at the expense of the real work of working to ensure that our country always strives towards the best possible realization of its founding principles. It makes it too easy for people to salute the flag and feel like they are good citizens and then turn away and ignore our failings.

To listen to the loudest voices of outrage, you would think that taking a knee during the national anthem is the highest form of disrespect for our nation. But, historically, kneeling has long been a gesture of respect. I wonder how many of these vocal protesters are Catholics who regularly bend a knee every time they go to church? How can they perform that gesture of respect so mindlessly, and then find the very conscious act of taking a knee for the anthem as disrespectful? Perhaps it's because they haven't paused to think about what is happening. Instead, they are simply reacting to an action that breaks the norms, that intentionally calls attention to itself. They simply cannot abide the "other", those who refuse to conform. "Don't rock the boat" seems to be their motto. More evidence that their patriotism is just for show, because if they were truly patriotic, then they would want to understand the protest, to right the injustice, to make our country better for everyone.

In contrast to those protesters who take a knee for the anthem, let's talk about the actions of the fans that truly disrespect the anthem. Before a Baltimore Orioles game at Camden Yards, the fans routinely shout "OH!" when the singer reaches the light "Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave?", which clearly shows their pride in their local team, but certainly is not respectful of the anthem. Similarly, at every home game of the Washington Capitals, some 18,000 fans shout "RED!" when the singer reaches the light about the "rockets red glare" to show their "Rock the Red" pride in the home hockey team. I find both of these shout-outs for the home teams to be *FAR* more disrespectful than a silent protest that simply involves a player taking a knee during the anthem.

Ultimately, I think that those angered by these protests are less concerned with the level of respect being shown for the anthem than they are with the reason for the protest. They are offended because these protests highlight serious injustices in our country, which upsets their comfortable view that the country is fine the way it is. If they acknowledge the legitimacy of the protests, then they would be forced to acknowledge that their comfort is built upon a system that is biased in their favor, and that true justice requires them to confront the realities of racism and bias in our social structures. And since they are not willing and/or able to do so, they must find ways to discredit the protesters. 

It is sad, really, that all of this energy is being expended arguing about the patriotism of the protesters, instead of addressing the very real injustices that they are trying to draw attention to. Addressing the issues of injustice would be true patriotism.

I've been thinking about writing about Colin Kaepernick and the issues raised by his refusal to stand for the national anthem as a gesture of support for the Black Lives Matter movement. The public reaction to his actions appear to have ended his career, since he has not been offered a new contract by any NFL team for this season. Around the league, a number of other players have begun to take a knee for the national anthem in support of Kaepernick and Black Lives Matter. It has been a couple of decades since I followed the NFL, but the cultural and economic impact of the league make it impossible to remain completely unaware of the controversy.

After the President dove into this issue this weekend, with a series of tweets (including coarse, vulgar language) calling for the owners of the NFL teams to fire any players who refuse to stand for the national anthem, I feel compelled to comment. It may take me a couple of posts to say everything I need to say, and even then I'm afraid that I won't be able to articulate all of what I'm thinking in ways that make sense.

Since the act of taking a knee or refusing to stand for the national anthem is, in my opinion, a form of protected free speech, I think it would be helpful to talk about the First Amendment. I suspect that there aren't many people who wouldn't recognize that the First Amendment protects our right to free speech (among other things), but I'm not sure how many understand that the First Amendment only prevents the government from restricting our practice of free speech. The First Amendment does not prevent employers from restricting the speech of their employees. In other words, you do NOT have an unrestricted right to free speech in the workplace.

So, if the NFL teams want to discipline players for protesting during the National Anthem, they have every right to do so. This is why Kaepernick cannot find a job in the league, and why he hasn't filed a lawsuit claiming that his free speech rights are being infringed. I have an opinion about whether Kaepernick deserves to be sanctioned for his protest, but the league and its teams can choose to do so if they wish.

But, when the President of the United States, who took an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, demands that players who express themselves in ways that he dislikes be fired, the equation changes. Now the players' speech rights are being infringed by government fiat, which is a clear violation of the First Amendment. It defies belief that our President either does not seem to understand or does not care that his demands are in direct conflict with the oath of office he took at his inauguration. Regardless of the merits of the protest (which I will address in a separate post, I think), the President simply has NO business injecting himself into the matter.

Beyond that, I find it troubling that so many people are so strongly offended when people don't stand for the national anthem. Many will argue that this is simply patriotism, but I would think that a true patriot would respect the rights of others to express themselves this way. It feels to me as if we've elevated respect for the flag and anthem to the position of a nationalist religion. Any action perceived to disrespect the flag or anthem thus becomes heresy, subject to the harshest sanction. This hardly seems to be a reflection of a healthy society to me. Wouldn't it better for us to embrace a patriotism that cares less for symbolic actions and focuses instead on acknowledging our shortcomings and working together to overcome them?

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit