Profile

resqgeek: (Default)
ResQgeek

May 2024

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-08 02:19 pm (UTC)
resqgeek: (Default)
From: [personal profile] resqgeek
The real reason I expect this to be challenged in court (and the reason I suspect it will be struck down in the process) is that I seriously doubt that the legislation clearly defines the boundaries of what is to be considered offensive. Without clearly defined guidelines, this law is probably written WAY too broadly, and as a result is open to discriminatory abuse.

I have to say that I commend the effort to make public libraries a more pleasant place, but I'm not sure all the implications of this legislation were fully considered.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit