ext_83128 ([identity profile] avanta7.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] resqgeek 2013-03-05 01:34 am (UTC)

Since it affects federal law (such as the Social Security Act), addressing marriage equality seems like ideal amendment fodder. Especially if the Supreme Court determines that the 14th Amendment equal protection clause does NOT apply in the cases it is currently considering.

Speaking of #14, I always thought the ERA was unnecessary due to that Amendment and the affirmative action legislation already on the books.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting